Is Sociology a Science?

‘Is Sociology a Science?’ has been a popular past question for all major exam boards and so there is no shortage of past questions, mark schemes and examiners reports for students and teachers to access and use for both planning and revision.

Students can be asked to draw out a table with three columns:

  1. Yes, sociology is a science

  2. No, sociology is not a science but it could be

  3. No, sociology is not a science and it should not try to be one.

Using materials from some of the exam board websites, for example

Discover More AQA

Discover More OCR

students should work in groups to locate past questions on this topic (in the light of recent reform remind them to look also at legacy specification materials). The past questions, as mentioned above, will have associated mark schemes and examiners reports that will point them in the direction of material they can include in their table.

This is a very useful exercise as ‘being the examiner’ can help when it comes to revision and exam preparation. Mark schemes may look a little daunting for students at first but being able to use them will help with their revision.

For a more advanced discussion, you might want to consider asking if Sociology should attempt to be a science at all? After all, what’s so good about science? This is an interesting question posed by Ted Porter in his 1996 book Trust in Numbers. Numbers are often seen to be objective and neutral; numbers do not lie. They are therefore an important political tool, as politicians and leaders like to draw on numbers and statistics to make their arguments and justify their position. Therefore, we could see numbers and statistics as the tools and methods of the powerful. So-called objective truths that are used to convince the population of ‘the facts’. And hence, academic subjects that wish to be taken seriously (and funded) need to (literally) play the numbers game, and produce serious and objective number and statistics. However, as many Sociologist would tell you, life is not easily reducible to numbers, and numbers, can often lie or certainly, do not always tell the whole story. Hence, should Sociology ever attempt to be ‘scientific’ or maybe it should be there to challenge the social order and the esteem placed upon scientific method and statistic?

More Resources from Discovering Sociology

Education Introduction

This topic is therefore useful as it allows students to apply, what can sometimes be quite abstra...


Class and Education

The material provided in the ‘subcultures’ section above has links to social class...


Correspondence Principle

The correspondence principle was proposed by Bowles and Gintis and is the suggestion that educ...


Current Party Positions on Education

It is important for Sociology students to be aware of contemporary issues in society by reading a...


Ethnicity & Education

The DfES, amongst others, have conducted surveys into the attainment of different ethnic groups i...



Like Marxists, Feminists take a conflict view of society here the conflict exists between men ...



Functionalists adopt a consensus view of society, that is, one based on harmony and agreement ...


Gender and Schooling

Sue Sharpe’s classic study ‘Just Like A Girl’ can be used to introduce the n...



Marxists take a conflict view of education and argue that it operates as an ideological tool. ...


New Right

For the New Right, the purpose of education is to promote drive, enterprise and initiative in ...


Subcultures in Education

A school subculture can be described as a group of pupils who share similar behaviours and views ...


What is the role of education?

In this RSA video (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce), Si...


Race and Education

This collection of documents (see link below) presents a sample of the British Library’s archi...